
Planning to buy a new sunscreen that you’ve seen in the market? Better think twice before you do that. According to a study conducted by the Environmental Working Group, a non profit research organization based in Washington D.C., 4 out of 5 sunscreen lotions do not give adequate protection against the harmful rays of the sun or contain harmful chemicals.
Most of these sunscreens seem to be effective for sunburns, but their efficiency in fighting skin cancer is under question. They seem to be having little effect on the prevalence of melanoma which is the deadliest form of skin cancer. The rate of contracting skin cancer remains steady. According to the National Cancer Institute this trend is actually on a rise. According to Dr. Marianne Berwick, a melanoma specialist, who heads the Division of Epidemiology (University of New Mexico), there is no evidence that sunscreens work against melanoma.
However, the industry experts are ready with their own versions on the effectiveness and safety of sunscreens.
According to John Baily , chief scientist at the Personal Care Products Council (a trade association for the cosmetic and personal care product industry) the materials used in sunscreens are tested in a number of ways in animal studies and clinical studies before being approved for usage by the public. According to him, the EWG is taking the laboratory studies into considerations and not the ones conducted on human beings and drawing conclusions that the products are unsafe and hence to be avoided. However, when asked about the effectiveness of the sunscreens on skin cancer he agreed that scientifically it cannot be said that sunscreens protect against melanoma.
A number of scientists believe that people who apply sunscreens remain in the sun for longer periods of time thinking that the sunscreen is actually protecting them against the sun. It has been observed that FDA (Food and Drug Administration), when checking a new brand of sunscreen, asks for the verification of its effectiveness against sunburn but not against melanoma and other forms of skin cancer.
But are the sunscreen manufacturers actually at fault? Before contemplating on that we should examine how the sunscreens have been working till now. It has been found that sunscreens are effective against sunburn but not skin cancer. How? The sun emits two types of rays that are harmful to the human skin. They are UVB (ultra violet B rays) and UVA (ultra violet A rays) both of which cause sunburn. Repeated sunburn may lead to skin cancer. The sunscreens that have been developed till now protect against sunburn caused by UVB and not UVA. Now UVA is being looked upon as a causal factor for melanoma. The SPF (Sun Protection Factor) might be effective in protecting against sunburn caused by UVB and not UVA.
Now, FDA that regulates sunscreens as over-the –counter drugs is rolling out a labeling system in which the manufacturer of the sunscreen has to specify its effectiveness against UVA by May. Also the acronym SPF will be changed to mean Sunburn Protection Factor rather than Sun Protection Factor.
According to Margaret Tucker, Director of Human Genetics Program and Chief of the Genetic Epidemiology Branch (National Cancer Institute), the newer generations of sunscreens might prove to be more effective against skin cancer. She was critical of the view that there is an increased risk of skin cancer in people who stay out in the sun for longer durations after applying a sunscreen. She opines that people do not apply adequate quantities of the sunscreen while exposing themselves to the sun. They do not reapply it during the day. According to her if you sweat, you need to apply it once every twenty minutes or at least after every couple of hours.
via: SFGate





Comments
This is true, most sunscreens have ingredients that beautify but do not protect skin from skin cancer.
http://www.homeopathicremediesfor.com/skin-care-sun-protection.html
Very true, most sunblocks have far from adequate SPF protection.
This article is totally true!! It’s sad to hear that even the FDA couldn’t catch this misguided information in order to inform and protect the public. However, I am glad to see the FDA now taking action to correctly inform the public of the new findings of both UV rays. Already being aware of the damaging effects of both UV rays I have always checked my sunscreen products. I recommend Remergent skin care products. Their products with SPF block both UVA and UVB rays. They also have a DNA Repair Formula that reverses the damaging effects from your current and past sun damage.
Hi Neil,
Thanks for visiting and sharing the link about the effectiveness of homeopathic remedies. I have visited the website and found some useful info there. I know modern homopathy is able to provide solutions for hair and skin problems too.
Thanks for visiting Claire. I do agree with what you say. Most of these sun protection formulae available in the markets deliver far less than they actually promise.
Nice to see you on my blog Eric. Thanks for your valuable information regarding the sunscreen solutions. I think people should try Remergent skin care products for effective sun protection. I will gather more information about the avialability of these products from their websites.
The only thing is, news like this can make people not want to buy or use suncreams. Going outside with sun protection, no matter how good or bad it is, is essential. Just keep applying it. Sun damage is soooo anti ageing and people just don’t realise that factor. I would rather be English pale with a honey glow than an orangutan orange look (and I have fewer wrinkles for my age).
http://www.mychoicebeauty.com/index.asp?mid=66&mid2=191&mid3=20